Legislature(1999 - 2000)
2000-03-15 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2510 HB 312 Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representative Smalley: Page 29, line 24: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "600,000" Insert "1,251,000" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2511 HB 312 Under General Funds: Delete "600,000" Insert "1,251,000" Representative Smalley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Harris, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Masek, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Ogan And so, Amendment No. 9 was not adopted. Amendment No. 10 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 17, line 8: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "78,928,300" Insert "80,516,900" Under General Funds: Delete "23,360,500" Insert "24,949,100" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2512 HB 312 Page 17, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete "1,211,400" Insert "2,800,000" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 10 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Williams changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 10 was not adopted. Amendment No. 11 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 3, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "4,434,400" Insert "4,564,400" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2513 HB 312 Under General Funds: Delete "3,810,700" Insert "3,940,700" Page 3, line 6: Under Allocations: Delete "2,469,900" Insert "2,599,900" Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 11 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. Representative Hudson moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Hudson was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Morgan, Smalley, Whitaker Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses And so, Amendment No. 11 was not adopted. Amendment No. 12 was not offered. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2514 HB 312 Amendment No. 13 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 10, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "11,980,400" Insert "12,339,200" Under General Funds: Delete "6,673,200" Insert "7,032,000" Page 10, line 19: Under Allocations: Delete "3,142,200" Insert "3,501,000" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 13 be adopted. Representative Williams objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Smalley Nays: Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, Kookesh, Masek, Ogan, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 13 was not adopted. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2515 HB 312 Amendment Nos. 14 - 18 were not offered. Amendment No. 19 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 3, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "18,117,700" Insert "18,872,900" Under General Funds: Delete "17,036,400" Insert "17,791,600" Page 3, line 31: Under Allocations: Delete "9,816,100" Insert "10,571,300" Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 19 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2516 HB 312 Absent: Barnes, Masek, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 19 was not adopted. Amendment No. 20 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 8, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "39,775,100" Insert "44,855,000" Under General Funds: Delete "39,775,100" Insert "44,855,000" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 20 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Brice, Sanders 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2517 HB 312 And so, Amendment No. 20 was not adopted. Amendment No. 21 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 25, line 21: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "8,957,800" Insert "9,057,800" Under General Funds: Delete "2,819,100" Insert "2,919,100" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 21 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Croft was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 21 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 21 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Brice, Sanders 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2518 HB 312 And so, Amendment No. 21 was not adopted. Amendment No. 22 was offered by Representative Smalley: Page 5, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,519,300" Insert "6,415,300" Under General Funds: Delete "5,052,900" Insert "5,948,900" Representative Smalley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 22 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 22 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 22 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Sanders, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Halcro, Ogan And so, Amendment No. 22 was not adopted. Amendment No. 23 was offered by Representative Smalley: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2519 HB 312 Add a new bill section to read: "Sec__ (a) Subject to (c) of this section, the sum of $500,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, division of labor standards and safety, for occupational safety and health. (b) Subject to (c) of this section, the sum of $1,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, division of workers' compensation. (c) The appropriation made by (a) and (b) of this section is conditional upon the failure to enact into law after passage during the Second Session of the Twenty-First Alaska State Legislature a version of HB 378 or SB 272, relating to worker safety programs." Representative Smalley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 23 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 23 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 23 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 13 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Kerttula, Smalley Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Sanders, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Austerman, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kookesh, Morgan, Ogan, Phillips, Rokeberg, Therriault And so, Amendment No. 23 was not adopted. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2520 HB 312 Amendment No. 24 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 4, following line 28: Insert "Renters' Equivalency Rebate" Under Appropriation Items: Insert "300,000" Under General Funds: Insert "300,000" Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 24 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. Representative Berkowitz placed a call of the House. The Speaker stated the call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 24 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 24 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses And so, Amendment No. 24 was not adopted. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2521 HB 312 Amendment No. 25 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 3, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "24,128,500" Insert "24,228,500" Under General Funds: Delete "23,630,400" Insert "23,730,400" Page 3, line 15: Under Allocations: Delete "22,800,400" Insert "22,900,400" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 25 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Kerttula was required to vote. Representative Phillips declared a conflict of interest. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 25 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 25 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Ogan, Smalley Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2522 HB 312 Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Austerman And so, Amendment No. 25 was not adopted. Amendment No. 26 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 15, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "29,030,500" Insert "30,243,500" Under General Funds: Delete "24,574,500" Insert "25,787,500" Page 15, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "174,800" Insert "1,387,800" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 26 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 26 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 26 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring, Ogan, Sanders, Smalley 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2523 HB 312 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Kookesh And so, Amendment No. 26 was not adopted. Amendment No. 27 was offered by Representative Kapsner: Page 7, line 25: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,231,800" Insert "15,781,800" Under General Funds: Delete "13,514,000" Insert "14,064,000" Page 7, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete "13,314,500" Insert "13,864,500" Representative Kapsner moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 27 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 27 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 27 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Smalley 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2524 HB 312 Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, Coghill, Croft, Kookesh, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 27 was not adopted. Amendment Nos. 28 - 39 were not offered. Amendment No. 40 was not offered. Amendment No. 41 was offered by Representative Ogan: Page 2, line 10, through page 30, line 23: Reduce the total amount of general funds appropriated in the appropriations on page 2, line10, through page 30, line 23, by reducing the total amount of general funds allocated in the travel component of the appropriations contained on page 2, line 10, through page 30, line23, by a total of $1,200,000. The reduction of $1,200,000 shall be apportioned among each of the appropriations in the same proportion that the amount of general funds authorized for expenditure in the travel component of that appropriation bears to the total amount of general funds authorized for expenditure in the travel component of all appropriations contained on page 2, line 10, through page 30, line 23. "General funds" includes funds described as general fund, general fund program receipts, general fund match, and general fund mental health fund. Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 41 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. Representative Halcro moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Halcro was required to vote. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2525 HB 312 Amendment to Amendment No. 41 was offered by Representative Ogan: Following the first sentence: Delete "each of the appropriations in the same proportion that the amount of general funds authorized for expenditure in the travel component of that appropriation bears to the total amount of general funds authorized for expenditure in the travel component of all appropriations contained on page 2, line 10, through page 30, line 23." Insert "each state department travel budgets at the discretion of the Governor." Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment to Amendment No. 41 be adopted. Representative Berkowitz objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment to Amendment No. 41 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 41 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Barnes, Croft, Dyson, Kemplen, Kohring, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault Nays: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill, Davies, Davis, Foster, Grussendorf, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kott, Morgan, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Smalley, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Kookesh And so, Amendment to Amendment No. 41 was not adopted. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2526 HB 312 Representative Davies rose to a point of order regarding casting aspersions and assigning inappropriate motives. The Speaker cautioned members to refrain from comments regarding personal motives. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 41 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 41 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Coghill, Dyson, Halcro, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Ogan, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault Nays: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Davis, Foster, Grussendorf, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Smalley, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses And so, Amendment No. 41 was not adopted. Amendment Nos. 42 - 44 were not offered. Amendment No. 45 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 18, line 28: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "9,320,400" Insert "9,345,400" Under General Funds: Delete "3,287,700" Insert "3,312,700" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2527 HB 312 Page 19, following line 3: Insert "Community Partnerships for Access, Solutions and Success (COMPASS) Community Grants 25,000" Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 45 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 45 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 45 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, Berkowitz, James, Ogan, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 45 was not adopted. Amendment No. 46 was offered by Representative Kapsner: Page 15, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "29,030,500" Insert "29,115,800" Under General Funds: Delete "24,574,500" Insert "24,659,800" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2528 HB 312 Page 15, line 22: Under Allocations: Delete "1,987,900" Insert "2,073,200" Representative Kapsner moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 46 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 46 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 46 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Morgan, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, James, Ogan, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 46 was not adopted. Amendment No. 47 was offered by Representative Kapsner: Page 15, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "29,030,500" Insert "30,332,500" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2529 HB 312 Under General Funds: Delete "24,574,500" Insert "25,876,500" Page 15, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "10,078,500" Insert "11,380,500" Representative Kapsner moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 47 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. **The presence of Representative Cowdery was noted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 47 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 47 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, James, Ogan, Rokeberg, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 47 was not adopted. Amendment No. 48 was offered by Representative Kerttula: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2530 HB 312 Page 8, line 30: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "62,843,200" Insert "64,843,200" Under General Funds: Delete "7,924,500" Insert "9,924,500" Page 9, line 10: Under Allocations: Delete "6,029,200" Insert "8,029,200" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 48 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 48 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 48 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, James, Kohring, Rokeberg, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 48 was not adopted. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2531 HB 312 Amendment No. 49 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 3, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "53,546,600" Insert "55,302,100" Under General Funds: Delete "53,546,600" Insert "55,302,100" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 49 be adopted. Representative Davis objected. The following members moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest: Representative Kerttula Representative Davis Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 49 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 49 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 7 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2532 HB 312 Absent: Barnes, James, Kohring, Mulder, Ogan, Rokeberg, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 49 was not adopted. Amendment No. 50 was not offered. Amendment No. 51 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 4, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "13,602,200" Insert "13,946,500" Under General Funds: Delete "8,936,300" Insert "9,280,600" Page 4, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete "7,684,800" Insert "8,029,100" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 51 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 51 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 51 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 7 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2533 HB 312 Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, James, Kapsner, Kohring, Morgan, Rokeberg, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 51 was not adopted. Amendment No. 52 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 6, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "125,259,700" Insert "125,484,700" Under General Funds: Delete "107,595,900" Insert "107,820,900" Page 6, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete "812,700" Insert "1,037,700" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 52 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 52 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 52 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 7 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2534 HB 312 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker Excused: Green, Moses Absent: James, Kapsner, Kohring, Ogan, Rokeberg, Sanders, Williams And so, Amendment No. 52 was not adopted. Amendment No. 53 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 7, line 32: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "18,847,100" Insert "19,847,100" Under General Funds: Delete "16,180,400" Insert "17,180,400" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 53 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 53 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 53 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 6 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2535 HB 312 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker Excused: Green, Moses Absent: James, Kapsner, Ogan, Rokeberg, Sanders, Williams And so, Amendment No. 53 was not adopted. Amendment No. 54 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 17, line 8: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "78,928,300" Insert "79,928,300" Under General Funds: Delete "23,360,500" Insert "24,460,500" Page 17, line 25: Under Allocations: Delete "1,199,300" Insert "1,899,300" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 54 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Ogan was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 54 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2536 HB 312 CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 54 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker Excused: Green, Moses Absent: James, Rokeberg, Sanders, Williams And so, Amendment No. 54 was not adopted. Amendment No. 55 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 13, line 18, following "Department of Health and Social Services": Insert "Abortion Services for Medicaid Eligible Women" Under Appropriation Items: Insert "506,000" Under General Funds: Insert "506,000" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 55 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 55 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2537 HB 312 CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 55 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: James, Rokeberg, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 55 was not adopted. Amendment No. 56 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 4, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "13,602,200" Insert "14,043,200" Under General Funds: Delete "8,936,300" Insert "9,377,300" Page 4, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete "7,684,800" Insert "8,125,800" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 56 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2538 HB 312 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 56 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 56 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Rokeberg, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 56 was not adopted. Amendment No. 57 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 29, line 5: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "74,399,000" Insert "74,509,000" Under General Funds: Delete "70,729,500" Insert "70,839,500" Page 29, line 6: Under Allocations: Delete "28,755,100" Insert "28,865,100" Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 57 be adopted. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2539 HB 312 Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 57 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 57 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 8 Yeas: Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, Berkowitz, Cissna, Joule, Kerttula, Masek, Ogan, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 57 was not adopted. Amendment No. 58 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 13, line 20: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "147,442,200" Insert "147,654,800" Under General Funds: Delete "91,055,100" Insert "91,267,700" Page 13, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete "829,300" Insert "1,041,900" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2540 HB 312 Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 58 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 58 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 58 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 7 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Davies, Grussendorf, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Croft, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Austerman, Barnes, Cissna, Joule, Masek, Ogan, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 58 was not adopted. Amendment No. 59 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 2, line 10: Under General Funds: Delete "9,578,200" Insert "9,708,200" Page 2, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "2,430,000" Insert "2,560,000" Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 59 be adopted. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2541 HB 312 Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 59 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 59 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 8 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Dyson, Masek, Morgan, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 59 was not adopted. Amendment No. 60 was offered by Representative Smalley: Page 29, line 24: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "600,000" Insert "820,000" Under General Funds: Delete "600,000" Insert "820,000" Representative Smalley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 60 be adopted. Representative Williams objected. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2542 HB 312 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 60 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 60 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 6 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, Dyson, Masek, Morgan, Sanders, Therriault And so, Amendment No. 60 was not adopted. Amendment Nos. 61 - 62 were not offered. Amendment No. 63 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 4, line 20: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "2,802,100" Insert "2,927,100" Under General Funds: Delete "1,465,600" Insert "1,590,600" Page 4, line 22: Under Allocations: Delete "2,264,900" Insert "2,389,900" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2543 HB 312 Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 63 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 63 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 63 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Coghill, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, Dyson, Masek, Therriault And so, Amendment No. 63 was not adopted. Amendment No. 64 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 23, line 33: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "8,504,600" Insert "8,504,880" Under General Funds: Delete "5,383,900" Insert "5,613,900" Under Other Funds: Delete "3,120,700" Insert "3,170,700" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2544 HB 312 Page 24, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete "5,254,500" Insert "5,534,500" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 64 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 64 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 64 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Cowdery, Davis, Kapsner And so, Amendment No. 64 was not adopted. Amendment No. 65 was offered by Representative Ogan: Page 2, line 10: Delete "38,888,300" Insert "38,775,300" Delete "9,578,200" Insert "9,465,200" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2545 HB 312 Page 2, line 12: Delete "483,600" Insert "370,600" Page 12, line 20: Delete "834,400" Insert "721,400" Delete "533,900" Insert "420,900" Page 13, line 7: Delete "8,499,300" Insert "8,195,300" Delete "8,389,300" Insert "8,085,300" Page 13, line 8: Delete "6,560,000" Insert "6,256,000" Page 18, line 28: Delete "9,320,400" Insert "9,127,400" Delete "3,287,700" Insert "3,094,700" Page 18, line 29: Delete "910,100" Insert "717,100" Page 19, line 21: Delete "12,403,800" Insert "12,323,800" Delete "5,406,500" Insert "5,326,500" Page 19, line 24: Delete "551,800" Insert "471,800" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2546 HB 312 Page 22, line 6: Delete "1,513,900" Insert "1,320,900" Delete "883,600" Insert "690,600" Page 22, line 7: Delete "334,200" Insert "141,200" Page 23, line 3: Delete "4,821,200" Insert "4,741,200" Delete "2,035,100" Insert "1,955,100" Page 23, line 4: Delete "560,500" Insert "480,500" Page 25, line 24: Delete "11,392,000" Insert "11,312,000" Delete "8,121,600" Insert "8,041,600" Page 25, line 25: Delete "632,600" Insert "552,600" Page 26, line 26: Delete "2,381,800" Insert "2,268,800" Delete "508,900" Insert "395,900" Page 26, line 27: Delete "1,347,200" Insert "1,234,200" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2547 HB 312 Page 30, line 27: Delete "466,495,100" Insert "466,329,188" Delete "172,143,300" Insert "171,977,388" Page 30, line 30: Delete "21,206,400" Insert "21,040,488" Page 31, line 23: Delete "49,040,600" Insert "48,960,600" Delete "48,740,600" Insert "48,660,600" Page 31, line 26: Delete "6,275,200" Insert "6,195,200" Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 65 be adopted. Representative Barnes objected. Representative Barnes moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Barnes was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 65 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 65 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Coghill, Kohring, Ogan, Sanders, Therriault 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2548 HB 312 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Foster, Grussendorf, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Smalley, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Davis, Kapsner, Kookesh, Mulder And so, Amendment No. 65 was not adopted. Amendment No. 66 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 2, line 25: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "34,256,500" Insert "35,300,100" Under General Funds: Delete "23,713,300" Insert "24,756,900" Page 2, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete "33,580,600" Insert "34,624,200" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 66 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 66 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 66 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 6 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2549 HB 312 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Harris, Hudson, James, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Foster, Halcro, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 66 was not adopted. Amendment No. 67 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 4, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "13,602,200" Insert "13,726,400" Under General Funds: Delete "8,936,300" Insert "9,060,500" Page 4, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete "7,684,800" Insert "7,808,800" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 67 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 67 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2550 HB 312 CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 67 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Foster, Kohring, Kookesh, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 67 was not adopted. Amendment No. 68 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 6, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "125,259,700" Insert "125,759,700" Under General Funds: Delete "107,595,900" Insert "108,005,900" Page 6, line 20: Under Allocations: Delete "11,184,000" Insert "11,684,000" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 68 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2551 HB 312 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 68 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 68 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Croft, Kohring, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 68 was not adopted. Amendment Nos. 69 - 70 were not offered. Amendment No. 71 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 25, line 14: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "7,548,000" Insert "8,148,000" Under General Funds: Delete "7,498,000" Insert "8,098,000" Page 25, line 16: Under Allocations: Delete "5,523,500" Insert "6,123,500" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2552 HB 312 Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 71 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 71 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 71 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Foster, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Morgan, Ogan, Smalley, Williams Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Kohring, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 71 was not adopted. Amendment No. 72 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 3, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "4,434,400" Insert "4,534,400" Under General Funds: Delete "3,810,700" Insert "3,910,700" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2553 HB 312 Page 3, line 9: Under Allocations: Delete "1,156,000" Insert "1,256,000" Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 72 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 72 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 72 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Foster, Grussendorf, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Morgan, Smalley, Williams Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Halcro, Harris, James, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Kohring, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 72 was not adopted. Amendment No. 73 was offered by Representative Joule: Page 3, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "18,117,700" Insert "18,453,500" 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2554 HB 312 Under General Funds: Delete "17,036,400" Insert "17,372,200" Page 3, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete "8,301,600" Insert "8,637,400" Representative Joule moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 73 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 73 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 73 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Grussendorf, Halcro, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, Morgan, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Foster, Harris, Hudson, James, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Kohring, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 73 was not adopted. Amendment No. 74 was offered by Representative Cissna: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2555 HB 312 Page 24, line 30: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "2,391,000" Insert "2,431,100" Under General Funds: Delete "1,788,600" Insert "1,828,700" Page 24, line 31: Under Allocations: Delete "1,567,700" Insert "1,607,800" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 74 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 74 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 74 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Kohring, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 74 was not adopted. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2556 HB 312 Amendment No. 75 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 8, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "678,213,600" Insert "678,513,600" Under General Funds: Delete "649,007,000" Insert "649,307,000" Page 8, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete "1,100,000" Insert "1,400,000" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 75 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 75 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 75 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses Absent: Kohring, Sanders 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2557 HB 312 And so, Amendment No. 75 was not adopted. Amendment No. 76 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 15, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "4,280,900" Insert "5,352,300" Under General Funds: Delete "1,417,100" Insert "2,209,900" Under Other Funds: Delete "2,863,800" Insert "3,142,400" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 76 be adopted. Representative Therriault objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 76 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 76 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Green, Moses 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2558 HB 312 Absent: Kohring, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 76 was not adopted. Representative Foster moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 312(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Berkowitz objected. The Speaker stated that CSHB 312(FIN) am will be in third reading on the March 16, 2000, calendar.